Resident charged with criminal sexual conduct

Published 11:00 am Tuesday, August 28, 2018

BUCHANAN — A Buchanan man who committed crimes that a judge referred to as “heinous” and “terrible” will serve time in prison after he was sentenced Monday morning in Berrien County Trial Court.

John Edward Adcock, 41, of Buchanan, was charged with attempted first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a person under 13 and criminal sexual conduct fourth-degree. He pleaded guilty to the crimes on July 3.

John Edward Adcock

Judge Charles LaSata sentenced Adcock to serve 23 to 60 months in prison for count one. He was also ordered to serve 60 days credit for count two. Adcock has credit for 60 days served and will serve the terms concurrently.

The crimes occurred in Buchanan between the October 2013 and December 2015. A victim spoke up and told the court about the damage the abuse had caused to their life, including the need for counseling.

“I strongly believe he should have the most time in jail as possible,” the victim said. “I don’t want him to hurt other children. I am determined not to let John’s choices bring out the worst in me.”

Assistant Prosecutor Cortney O’Malley-Septoski also emphasized the emotional toll of the crimes. She said the victims involved had been amazingly strong.

She turned to face the court for a moment as she spoke.

“At least he takes responsibility for what he does,” O’Malley-Septoski said. “He admitted to the Department of Corrections the assaults that he committed.”

Defense attorney Lanny Fisher said his client was indeed upfront and cooperative with police. He also indicated that Adcock did not have a prior record.

“Mr. Adcock has never been in trouble before,” Fisher said. “He has worked and doesn’t do drugs.”

Fisher asked for LaSata to sentence his client to 12 months of jail or KPEP so that Adcock have the opportunity to be a member of society.   

When it was his turn to speak, Adcock read aloud a letter he wrote. 

“I’m truly sorry,” he said. “I don’t know how to express in words how sorry I am.”

LaSata said he believed it was warranted to order Adcock to serve more than the maximum recommended for the crime.

“Even if you are a good person otherwise, it is such a heinous and terrible crime,” LaSata said.