“To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects. — Margaret Thatcher

 

In our last article, the dangers and toxicity of using hydrofluorosilicic acid as a means to fluoridate our water supply was the topic. Again, hydrofluorosilicic acid, what is put into some community water supplies, is not the fluoride found in toothpaste or other topically applied methods, it is a toxic byproduct produced by the phosphate industries that need to have an outlet for getting rid of it in a cost effective manner.

If it is put into the air it is a pollutant. If it gets into a river, it is a pollutant. If it gets into a lake, it is a pollutant, but somehow, magically, when added to our drinking water, it is not a pollutant.

Wrong.

When a message of truth is put forth that goes against a belief system, “Fluoride is good,” it is often hard to hear, even harder to accept. Response is often, “But, everyone does this. The consensus is that it is needed and we should be doing it because the American Dental Association says so and the Environmental Protection Agency says the levels aren’t harmful.” The consensus.

My, oh my, what a dangerous word, what a dangerous practice.

There are those in this world who are born with a spirit that questions. Often we become writers, journalists and whistleblowers. It can be a curse as well as a blessing. I hold to the adage: just because Grandpa Henry always did it that way doesn’t make it right.

Curiosity and the thirst for knowledge, for truth, is a hunger I wake with each day. You don’t have to be born with this. It is something you can learn to snack on as opposed to it becoming insatiability. For those who deal with its ever present need to be fed; consensus just tastes wrong. It lacks the flavor of fact, of science, of truth.

Michael Crichton says it best, “I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

“There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”

So, I will not go further into the debate of who is doing it and why. I stand on the factual science and data: dumping a neurotoxin and waste by-product of the phosphate and nuclear industries is harmful to the human body. Even if it was the same fluoride as in toothpaste, which is a poison in itself, never to be ingested: we are poisoning our bodies with each glass of water we drink in the Village of Cassopolis.

Don’t tell me Grand Rapids does it and decided to continue it. I don’t live there, I don’t pay for water there and I frankly don’t care if they put pink sparkle bubbles in it. I want the poison added to my drinking water without my consent removed. Do the research, read the scientific facts.

For more information http://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/fluoride-worse-than-we-thought or feel free to email me at cassopoliscan@gmail.com and I can provide you with multiple resources regarding this topic.

 

CeeCee Wilson is the organizer of Cass Can, Inc. and owner of Last Tagine in Paris, LLC. Find them on Facebook.