Former Supt. Richard Weigel.
Former Supt. Richard Weigel.

Archived Story

District to pay superintendent $115,000 severance

Published 1:21pm Friday, March 7, 2014

Former Niles Community Schools Superintendent Richard Weigel will be paid one year’s salary as part of a severance package and will receive his normal wages through June 30 while serving as a consultant. Those details are spelled out in a separation agreement between Weigel and the district that the Niles Daily Star obtained Friday through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Both parties agreed to keep the agreement confidential but acknowledged it would have to be released through a FOIA.

The board of education formally accepted Weigel’s resignation Wednesday,  March 5, although the separation agreement states the resignation became effective Feb. 24. District officials said several times during that week-and-a-half period that Weigel was out on sick leave.

The agreement states that Weigel’s resignation is voluntary. The school board held nearly a half dozen closed sessions to discuss personnel matters during the weeks before his resignation. When asked to comment after one of those sessions, board president Kathy Zeider said there was an investigation that began last month, but she declined to elaborate because it was attorney/client privileged information.

Weigel, who was hired in 2010, will continue to pay the employee contribution for healthcare and other benefits and receive those benefits through June 30.

At that time, the district will pay Weigel $115,000 in a lump sum severance payment. After that, the district will not make any salary payments to him.

Weigel’s contract was set to expire June 30, 2016. His base wage was $115,000, so the district essentially bought out his contract for less than half of what he would have been paid in salary and benefits over the next two years.

“If the district had paid out Dr. Weigel’s full contract, it would have cost more than double — when including benefits — (than) the separation agreement cost. As such, this is a fiscally conservative move for the district,” the board of education said in an emailed statement.

“While the Board conducts a comprehensive search for a permanent replacement, it was determined that it would be beneficial that Dr. Weigel serve as a consultant for the remainder of the school year to ensure a smooth transition,” the prepared release stated.

The district also agreed to write a positive letter of recommendation, acknowledging Weigel’s achievements as superintendent. In that letter, the board pointed out that the district’s enrollment increased every year under Weigel’s watch and that ACT and NWEA scores have also improved. The letter also acknowledged that Weigel was the driving force behind opening a New Tech school in the district and the re-opening of Eastside Connection School as a magnet school.

“The administrators have been pushed under his leadership and he has done his best to teach them,” the letter reads. “He leads by example. He consistently talks about school culture and how that is the key toward making improvements.”

Since Weigel was given significant praise in the letter, what specifically went wrong between Weigel, the board and the administrators remains a mystery.

In a resignation letter to the board dated Feb. 25, one day after the date referenced in the agreement, Weigel wrote that his “vision for the future of the district differs fundamentally from the vision held by some members of the administration and perhaps some members of the board. These fundamental differences will inevitably interfere with my ability to effectively lead this district according to my vision.”

Language in the separation agreement also indicates that some administrators and board members had developed irreconcilable and fundamental differences on the leadership vision of the district but did not offer any specific examples.

Weigel did not return a phone call Friday or messages left earlier in the week. Zeider was unavailable for comment Friday, according to the district’s public relations firm.

The entire separation agreement can be read here.

By using this website’s user-contribution features, including comments, photo galleries, or any other feature, you agree to abide by the terms of use. Please read this agreement in its entirety because it contains useful information that will help you better understand the rules and general "good manners" that are expected when contributing content to this website.

  • Mark

    Ypsilanti all over again!

  • tami davis

    $115,000.00 for leaving?????? How utterly ridiculous!!! And you wonder what’s wrong with our schools? You want to lay off all these teachers, kids having to walk to school because the school district is having money problems so they can’t afford buses……WONDER WHY??????????? How in the world can you justify this??? I see where our problems come from…paying ridiculous wages and then stuff like this!!! Take that $115,000.00 and give it to the teachers or the schools but not someone who’s stepping down! RIDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Garry

    I guess I am stupid, He resigned, why would the Niles School System have to pay him anything? Is resigning the same thing as quitting?

    • Alvin Cavanaugh

      This guy should leave the same way that he came…with nothing.

  • Dave Fisher

    The board got “educated” by this snake…. When you set up things that create division it’s what you end up with. It divides a community from it’s money too.

    These same folks will pick the next one too?

  • Sandy Smith

    I believe this would be called, “hush money!” What a waste of taxpayer dollars. Paying him the rest of this school year which would result in approximately $36,000 plus benefits in addition to the $115,000! Approximate total payment over $200,000 to the district and taxpayers. Sad! Then the board of education writes a letter of recommendation saying all the wonderful things he has done for the district? Consequently, the next district to hire him will be throwing money out the window just like Niles. How sad the board of education has no remorse for that move. What happened to spending this money to improve and accelerate the academic performance for all the great students at Niles schools.

  • Brett Hardesty

    Keep in mind in the 2014-15 school year we will in addition to paying Weigel his severance also be paying his replacement so essentially assuming the new super is paid similarly the position will cost us over 230,000 in 2014-15.Since we obviously got snookered with a dictatorial type of leader (my way or no way) what we need is to hire from inside the district.At the very least we will know what to expect from the candidate and at most we will know the candidate can work well with everyone.Another good issue is it puts a local to work and opens up a position for another individual inside the district to advance into an administrative position.

Editor's Picks