Archived Story

School board not done cutting budget

Published 9:31pm Monday, June 17, 2013

A preliminary budget Dowagiac Board of Education adopted Monday night at city hall shows the district spending less in 2014 than it did in 2011.

 

Though a projected deficit has been halved from $1,494,148 to $705,979, more needs to be cut to maintain a recommended 10 percent reserve, President Michelle Helmuth-Charles said.

 

In the coming school year, according to the presentation by Finance Director Dawn Copley, the district projects fewer students, $19,728,716 in revenues and $20,434,695 in expenditures.

 

“We’re proposing a $966,000 decrease from the current fiscal year,” Copley said. “Based on the final revision, it’s an overall decrease of $1,755,077. Revenue is based on getting the full 18 mills for property taxes, which will give us $4,544,000. There were some one-time things in the 2012-13 school year we are not going to have to deal with in 2013-14. We had to expense bus financing of $301,000. Another bus (wrecked in March) was an insurance claim. The new budget does not include any expenses for emergencies which came up, like a well and roof units that went out.”

 

Copley said “good things” contained in the spending plan include a $50-per-student equity payment from the state which equates to $113,000 in one-time revenue and a $60-per-student state aid foundation increase from $6,996 to $7,026 which provides another $135,000.

 

She calculated the budget on 2,261 students, or 31 less than attended Dowagiac schools in 2012-13. This year’s state aid was based on 2,292 pupils.

 

“We’re losing about 60 kids a year, whether they’re moving or going to other districts,” Copley said. “All wages were frozen. On the expense side, we cut quite a bit — which was our goal. By switching from summer tax collection to winter tax collection, we cut approximately $27,000 — primarily the $2.50 parcel fee for each of five townships for which we collected summer taxes. We’re offering sociology and psychology at the high school to reduce our dual enrollment costs $20,000. With the retirement incentive we offered, we had three take advantage of buyouts from the top end of the pay scale.

 

“We saved $253,000,” Copley said, “and realigned staff across the board. We were able to save $180,000 for those. We’re projecting we’ll be able to eliminate overloads at the high school, for $85,000. We cut 10 percent from transportation, maintenance and athletic supplies where we could.”

 

Voters will be asked Aug. 6 to renew 18 operating mills levied on non-homestead properties.

 

 

 

By using this website’s user-contribution features, including comments, photo galleries, or any other feature, you agree to abide by the terms of use. Please read this agreement in its entirety because it contains useful information that will help you better understand the rules and general "good manners" that are expected when contributing content to this website.

  • Sue

    Do we really need to have a deputy superintendent on the payroll? Can the superintendent handle the job without one?
    That would save a lot of money.

Editor's Picks