Archived Story

Citizens voice concerns about county landfill sale

Published 11:05pm Thursday, July 22, 2010

Bertrand Township trustee Dick Haigh (center) gives a presentation about the landfill as citizens help pass out copies of information on the sale. The Niles Township supervisor also passed out information about his side of the story. (Daily Star photo/KATIE JOHNSON)
Bertrand Township trustee Dick Haigh (center) gives a presentation about the landfill as citizens help pass out copies of information on the sale. The Niles Township supervisor also passed out information about his side of the story. (Daily Star photo/KATIE JOHNSON)

By KATIE JOHNSON

Niles Daily Star

Citizens packed the Niles Conference Inn Thursday night to learn more about the proposed sale of the Southeast Berrien County Landfill, but few answers were revealed.

Organized by Bertrand Township trustees Dick Haigh and David Zelmer, the public hearing included a question-and-answer session and presentation primarily given by Haigh discussing the alleged actions that led up to the landfill board’s 6-4 vote on May 19 to sell the landfill.

A $1.2 million loan to replace a nearly filled cell was put on hold when several municipal owners refused to back it.

Niles Charter Township Supervisor Jim Kidwell has been critical of pursuing a bank loan for a landfill operating on a $700,000 deficit.

Haigh and Zelmer were both against the sale, as were Richard Noble of Niles Township and Brian Dineen of Buchanan Township. Haigh accused the other board members of holding “secret closed door” meetings prior to the vote, what he called “a violation of public trust.”

“Is this the way you want your elected public officials to represent you?” he asked the citizens. “It seems quite a plan to me … they really do have something to hide.”

The suspected “secret” meetings are ludicrous, said Kidwell, who attended the hearing.

“He (Haigh) has nothing to base it on,” Kidwell said.

“There were no secret meetings,” he said, and that board members have been debating this issue for many years and are educated about the workings of the landfill.

Kidwell allegedly told WNDU during a July 14 interview that the landfill had been discussed during committee meetings; Haigh claims there were no such meetings.

Kidwell claims he believes Niles Township residents are supportive of the sale of the landfill, which he says needs to be “run by a professional” and is currently a liability. If sold, Bertrand Township will receive a more than $70,000 per year tipping fee. He said public hearings do not need to be on the other four municipalities’ agendas — Niles Township, City of Niles, Buchanan Township and Buchanan — because they would be a waste of taxpayers’ money and also because the landfill board members have made an educated decision.

Several citizens speculated about whether or not waste rates will increase under a private company; no answers to those questions were available, as any details are still premature.

Bertrand Township Clerk Jane Lano said following the hearing that Haigh claiming secret meetings have been held is “the pot calling the kettle black.”

She claims that some board members have met as a quorum, but did not issue public notices first.

“I think that to do this tonight was very premature,” she said. “There’s not enough information.

“They were manipulated,” she said of the citizens attending the hearing. “They heard what the presenter wanted them to hear.”

Some citizens inquired about circulating a petition or putting the issue to a referendum vote. It is too late to get it on the 2010 ballot, but no one had any answers as to the procedure for a petition.

Haigh encouraged citizens to voice their opinions to officials and attend meetings.

Bertrand Township meets the second Thursday of each month at 7 p.m.

Niles Township meets the first and third Monday at 7 p.m.

Buchanan Township meets the first and third Thursday at 7 p.m.

City of Buchanan meets the second and fourth Monday at 6 p.m.

City of Niles meets the second and fourth Monday at 6 p.m.

By using this website’s user-contribution features, including comments, photo galleries, or any other feature, you agree to abide by the terms of use. Please read this agreement in its entirety because it contains useful information that will help you better understand the rules and general "good manners" that are expected when contributing content to this website.

  • sh

    I attended the meeting this evening. Only one side of the story was presented. People of all the municipalities need to do their own research. Bertrand Township Board is trying to scare it’s residents not to sell the landfill, because their trash fees will increase.

    My question is: Who is going to fund the continuance of the Landfill? It operates in a deficit, and is non-profit. When it’s closed for good, somebody is going to be responsible for maintaining the sight for 30 years.

    I think somebody is trying to hide something, but I’m not sure it’s Niles and Buchanan, as was accused. It doesn’t make any sense—-why is Bertrand determined to keep it?

    I’m tired of the smell, the trash and the ground water pollution.

  • johnsjee

    Being on a board is a great responsibility to make certain all those the particular issue concerns are notified, not just a few who aren’t going to be directly effected by the final decision. It’s important to follow guidelines that are always firm in structure – for the community to be able to review, say, a year from now to make sensible moves in more that just the immediate future. As usual, this landfill thing, is typically suspect; who’s the guy hoping to pocket the most $.

  • justice4all

    I was at this meeting as well and it really was unfortunate that Haigh didn’t have anything other than his opinions to state. He offered no material evidence, no proof, no documentation to support any of his allegations, accusations or claims. I found that very disappointing.

    I also find it concerning that Haigh and apparently others on the Bertrand Township Board are so opposed to selling. If people think that their concern is because it’s likely that trash hauling rates for the residents are going to increase, that’s pretty naive. I called around to some of the other areas in Michigan that are serviced by haulers that take their trash to privately owned landfills and guess what, their rates were no higher that what many are already paying in our area. So, I do believe that sh is correct in his comment, Somebody is trying to hide something and I happen to think it might be Mr. Haigh himself! He’s had his hands all over that landfill for the last 14 years and just maybe he’s partially responsible for the condition it’s in now and just maybe he doesn’t want that part of the story to come out! I’ve got nothing to back that claim up but what does it matter, we’re all entitled to state our opinions. Right, Mr. Haigh?

Editor's Picks